top of page

The Growing Demand for NHS Respiratory Care

August 25th, 2026

Respiratory disease is one of the largest contributors to demand on NHS services. Chronic respiratory conditions such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other long-term lung diseases place sustained pressure on primary care, community respiratory services, emergency departments and hospitals [1]. As the prevalence of these conditions continues to rise, delivering timely, effective care within finite NHS resources becomes increasingly difficult.

Much of this demand is caused by unplanned respiratory exacerbations. When early signs of deterioration are not recognised or acted upon, exacerbations can rapidly progress to emergency presentations and hospital admissions. Exacerbations are associated with poorer patient outcomes, increased healthcare costs and significant pressure on already stretched NHS services [2]. Consequently, there is growing recognition that respiratory care must shift from a predominantly reactive model towards one that enables earlier intervention and proactive disease management.

Addressing this challenge will require new approaches that support earlier detection of clinical deterioration and enable more targeted use of NHS resources. This article explores the factors driving demand for respiratory care, the impact of exacerbations on patients and healthcare services, and how continuous remote monitoring could help clinicians identify deterioration sooner, prioritise patients according to clinical need, and intervene before avoidable hospital admissions occur.


The Pressure on NHS Respiratory Services

COPD and asthma are estimated to affect approximately 1.7 million and 7.2 million people in the UK, respectively [3,4]. COPD alone accounts for over 118,000 emergency hospital admissions annually in England alone [5]. While approximately 185 people in the UK are admitted to hospital every day with an asthma attack [6]. The resulting cost to the NHS in treating asthma and COPD are approximately £3 billion and £1.9 billion per year, respectively [7].

The demand for respiratory services is only increasing as the prevalence of respiratory disease rises. Factors such as an ageing population, seasonal respiratory infections, air pollution and the growing impact of climate change, and higher rates of exacerbations are expected to place further pressure on these services[1].

At the same time, NHS respiratory services face significant capacity constraints. Workforce shortages, limited outpatient clinic capacity, increasing waiting times and sustained pressure on emergency departments and hospital beds mean that clinicians are required to manage growing numbers of patients with finite resources [1]. This makes it increasingly challenging to identify those whose condition is deteriorating before they require urgent care.

Pulmonary Hypertension Infographic.png

The Cost of Unplanned Respiratory Care

While chronic respiratory diseases often require ongoing management, it is unplanned exacerbations that place the greatest strain on NHS resources. Exacerbations frequently result in emergency department attendances, ambulance call-outs and hospital admissions, making them one of the most resource-intensive aspects of respiratory care. In COPD, exacerbations account for the majority of healthcare costs, with hospital admissions being the largest single contributor to NHS expenditure [2].

Emergency admissions are expensive, with a single hospitalisation for an acute COPD exacerbation estimated to cost between £1,000 and £7,000, depending on severity, with more severe exacerbations often requiring prolonged inpatient care or intensive care support [8]. During periods of high seasonal demand, respiratory admissions contribute significantly to bed occupancy, reducing capacity across the wider health system [1].

The impact extends well beyond the initial admission. Approximately 20% of patients admitted with a COPD exacerbation are readmitted within 30 days, while almost one-third are readmitted within 90 days [9]. Recurrent exacerbations are also associated with accelerated decline in lung function, poorer quality of life, greater risk of future hospitalisation and increased mortality [2]. As a result, each exacerbation increases demand not only on acute services but also on primary care, community respiratory teams and pulmonary rehabilitation services.


The Opportunity for Earlier Intervention

Many respiratory exacerbations develop gradually over several days, with worsening symptoms and measurable physiological changes preceding the need for emergency care. However, these early warning signs often occur between routine clinical appointments and may go unnoticed until the patient's condition has deteriorated sufficiently to require urgent treatment [2].

Continuous remote monitoring offers an opportunity to identify deterioration earlier by providing clinicians with objective, longitudinal data on a patient's respiratory status. Detecting subtle changes over time could enable earlier intervention, helping to prevent exacerbations from progressing to emergency presentations or hospital admissions [2].

Earlier detection could also support more effective risk stratification, allowing clinicians to prioritise patients showing objective evidence of deterioration and target limited NHS resources towards those at greatest risk. As the demand for respiratory services continues to grow, technologies that support proactive, data-driven disease management have the potential to improve patient outcomes while helping the NHS move from reactive care towards prevention [10].


Conclusion

As the prevalence of respiratory disease continues to rise, the NHS faces increasing pressure to deliver high-quality care with limited resources. Supporting earlier detection of deterioration and more proactive management could help reduce avoidable exacerbations, improve patient outcomes and ensure that NHS resources are directed towards those who need them most.

blue heart (3).png

Get In Touch

Interested in strategic collaborations? Let’s discuss how electronRx can support your respiratory pipeline

References

1. UK Government. FIT FOR THE FUTURE 10 Year Health Plan for England. 2025. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6888a0b1a11f859994409147/fit-for-the-future-10-year-health-plan-for-england.pdf

2. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. GOLD 2025 Report. Published online 2025.

3. Asthma + Lung UK. What is chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)? Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.asthmaandlung.org.uk/conditions/copd-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease/what-chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease

4. Asthma + Lung UK. What is asthma? Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.asthmaandlung.org.uk/conditions/asthma/what-asthma

5. Office for Health Improvement & Disparities. Respiratory Disease Profile: Statistical Commentary, May 2026. 2026. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/update-of-indicators-in-the-respiratory-disease-profile-may-2026/respiratory-disease-profile-statistical-commentary-may-2026

6. UK Parliament. Improving asthma outcomes in the UK. December 3, 2021. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2021-0185/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

7. NHS England. Respiratory disease. Accessed July 30, 2026. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/clinical-policy/respiratory-disease/

8. Rehman A ur, Hassali MAA, Muhammad SA, Harun SN, Shah S, Abbas S. The economic burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Europe: results from a systematic review of the literature. The European Journal of Health Economics. 2020;21(2):181-194.

9. Alqahtani JS, Njoku CM, Bereznicki B, et al. Risk factors for all-cause hospital readmission following exacerbation of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Respiratory Review. 2020;29(156):190166.

10. Janjua S, Banchoff E, Threapleton CJ, Prigmore S, Fletcher J, Disler RT. Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2021;2021(4).

bottom of page